As a Jew, I can tell you that I get judged quite often for simply being born a Jew.

I don't exactly understand your point, are you assuming that all atheists are friendly to Jews?
I find that hard to believe.
Not all humans are the same (obviously), and grouping people for a certain reason (atheism) only to apply another reason onto them (rejecting non-Jewish religions) is far from reality.

There are athesists that dislike Jews just as there are that like Jews.

What's wrong with Jews? Nothing.
The only religion that is fundamentally evil would be Islam. Islam conquered half of the world in the middle ages on Muhammads command, and today most terrorist groups are Islamic.

In "The Protocols of Zion"

What's the problem with being a terrorist if it was against the bad people?

I am not propagating conspiracy theories here, this is the reality.

+Muhammad conquered half the world to spread islam (aka the true religion), if muhammad was able to spread it without war, he would have done so.

But this is how the world works... everything must be imposed by force

Just look around... newton, einstein, pythagoras, charles darwin, and many many more. All of these people who built the pillars of atheism were members of secret jewish movements (freemasonry, rosicrucian and others).

I don't understand your point, i can classify you as a terrorist too, that doesn't really make you a bad person. +what's wrong with being a terrorist if it was against the bad people?

+Muhammad conquered half the world to spread islam (aka the true religion), if muhammad was able to spread it without war, he would have done so.

But this is how the world works... everything must be imposed by force, the real difference is who uses force to spread good and who uses it to spread evil.

It appears you have been deceived. The contents of the book are false. I'm sure everyone has been misled at least once in their life, and it serves as a learning experience to be corrected.

I won't blame you for falling for conspiracy theories because this:

Can you please explain to me why Newton, Einstein, Pythagoras and Darwin are the pillars of atheism? They may be pillars of science but science and atheism are definitely not the same and science and religion are not in conflict. Darwin even said himself that a god may exist, but that he just doesn't care. That's not atheism, that's agnosticism.

How is Islam the true religion? Islam teaches you go to a heavenly brothel and get 72 virgins and river of wine when you are killed in jihad. And Muslims believe this because an illiterate Arab warlord from the 7th century who married a 6 year old and had dozens of sex slaves said so. And it gets even more absurd when Muslims go to Mecca every year to kiss some pagan black stone. Good thing many Muslims leave this cult.

What's wrong with Jews? Nothing.
The only religion that is fundamentally evil would be Islam. Islam conquered half of the world in the middle ages on Muhammads command, and today most terrorist groups are Islamic.

Allah has indeed purchased from the believers their lives and wealth in exchange for Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah and kill or are killed

Fight against those who do not believe in Allāh or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allāh and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah1 willingly while they are humbled.

"You have your religion and I have mine"
-- Al Kafirun Qur'an 109:1-6

"And cooperate in righteousness and piety, but do not cooperate in sin and aggression"

One can not justify war like this. Islam and many other religions are based on the idea of incentivizing belief in one view of the world (via promises of afterlife and social pressure), and punishing skepticism and nonconformity (via same strategies), making it very successful at gaining and keeping followers, but as a side effect it also creates an extremely ideologically restricted social environment (which then makes further restrictions easier to enable... *cough* morality police *cough*). These are the underlying mechanisms behind how many common religions function, which is why I have a critical view of them. I see the massive spread of Islam as a net loss for humanity because all those people are now ideologically confined and will only agree with things that are consistent with the beliefs imposed on them at a young age, preventing important things like social innovation and the ability to form social ties with other groups of people.

Religions mastered the art of gamification and creating ideological bubbles before it was cool, except for it never became cool because it has very negative effects.

The theories are of course occasionally true, but their truth is completely uncorrelated with the believer's certainty. For some reason, sometimes when people think they've uncovered a lie, they raise confirmation bias to an art form. They cut context away from facts and arguments and assemble them into reassuring litanies. And over and over I've argued helplessly with smart people consumed by theories they were sure were irrefutable, theories that in the end proved complete fictions.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is the most notorious and widely distributed antisemitic publication of modern times. Its lies about Jews, which have been repeatedly discredited, continue to circulate today, especially on the Internet. The individuals and groups who have used the Protocols are all linked by a common purpose: to spread hatred of Jews.

The Protocols is entirely a work of fiction, intentionally written to blame Jews for a variety of ills. Those who distribute it claim that it documents a Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world. The conspiracy and its alleged leaders, the so-called Elders of Zion, never existed.

Let alone the fact that you didn't even try to prove any of @ ModJuicer's points wrong, you just went on a full on rage mode against Jews without proper proofs to back your claims.

It's almost as if everything you're talking about was taughed to you at a young age (of which you likely still are in), and you just had no other choice but to believe in it.

And about atheism, it's a very "selfish" thing, we don't "spread" it, most of us keep it to ourselves and most of my friends don't even know that I'm one, so I don't see your point.

Do you even understand your Quran? The Quran is made out of two parts: The early Meccan Surah where Muhammad had no power, and the latter Medinan Surah where Muhammad had a huge army and tried to force convert everyone into his false cult. Islam teaches abrogation, which means that the violent verses replace the earlier peaceful verses. Surah 9 is the last big chapter of the Quran and look what it says in 9:111:

Have you ever asked yourself why people hate jews? everything has a reason.

In my generation, yes, i saw hate on some certian level against jews when i was young at school, but today, when i open school books of my younger brother only to find that they praise the jews in an indirect way, even putting characters like charles darwin as a scientest in it, the funny thing that all of this is happening in "islamic schools".

Just another proof that "islamic" governments has no real power and are infiltrated by jews. They are just another puppet in their hands, as is the case with european governments.

What points did he exactly make? all he has done is attacking islam (and this i will not respond to because it is not our topic) and sending some jewish sites links which denies that the protocols are made by jews.

Jews has an incredibly reach in many governments today, in fact, they are so dedicated that they have entire institutions just to watch the internet and to report any "anti-semitic" posts.

You are doing just what every other conspiracy theorist does: cut context from facts and arguments and assemble them into reassuring litanies. And you bear another hallmark of conspiracy theorists as well: The complete confidence in your view, even when mountains of evidence declare it false. You have a hill to die on: your theories about Jews. I predict that you will never change your mind about this. Ever. That is because conspiracy theorists very rarely change their mind even when when confronted with evidence. Am I right about that? I think I am.

Therefore, it is axiomatic that the sites that will appear for him on the internet will deny the truth of the protocols, and will spread false and misleading information to show the jews as good people, so i don't really understand why those sites are considered as evidences against me.

Note that this was the first link that appeared on the web search "protocols of zion". Also, feel free to look it up yourself: https://www.google.com/search?q=protocols+of+zion and you will find the same.

all he has done is attacking islam

On the otherside, i told him that the protocols are identical with torah (the main jewish book) and the literature of the freemasons, and i gave him an example of that. I gave him a proof and he didn't respond with any.

It became a trend hundreds of years ago, culminating in Nazism.

No, it is proof that the government does not want overly Islamic teachings

Have you looked it up yet? Have you read any of the related links? Reply to me after you do that, please.

The Protocols of Zion are false, and thus have no value as evidence, even if you found a fancy coincidence somewhere (or more likely just heard about that coincidence from a different conspiracy theorist and repeated the claim)

For example: one of the protocols says that the jews must spread chaos and disorder on the rest nations so that they can gain power and convince people that they need them.

This was taken literally from torah

Check this https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/16021/jewish/Chapter-24.htm

I don't have time to bring up all the evidences, it's too much, and it's difficult for me to write you in english because it's not my first language.

Now enough with the baseless claims like "well, the Jews are evil and powerful" or "the Jews ate babies" and whatnot