Offline
It's for the shieldhit hook
Forum
CS2D
Scripts How to check if a player is scoping
How to check if a player is scoping
10 replies
1 
It's for the shieldhit hook
I think there's no way in general to check if a player is scoping. In hooks like
hit it would be possible to check for scoping by checking the amount of damage. This isn't a 100% accurate solution in all cases though (damage can be reduced by previous hits).Since
shieldhit doesn't even provide a damage value it's not even possible to use a damage based workaround there 
DC: I decided to use item(wpn_id, 'dmg').
Dirty workaround, but it works well if I use a multiplier like
* 0.5.
But then I had a problem when I thought about player scoping, for now I ignore scoping but that'll affect gameplay...
There should be a "DMG" variable that gives the amount of damage that the shield mitigated.
player(p, 'weaponmode').
attack2 if I am not wrong. Masea: Yeah it's possible to follow the weapon mode for every player in a variable.But, its unefficient and not really worth the effort.
Plus, it could go wrong without you even realizing it.
Mami Tomoe. Thought about adding the very same thing. Will do so. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
player1zoom = 0
addhook("attack2","_attack2")
function _attack2(id,mode)
if mode==1 then
player1zoom = 1
elseif mode==2 then
player1zoom = 2
end
end
addhook("shieldhit","_shieldhit")
function _shieldhit(id,source)
if player1zoom == 1 then
msg("ah is one")
elseif player1zoom == 2 then
msg("oh is two")
end
end
addhook("select","_select")
function _select(id)
player1zoom = 0
end
I think is enough to keep at least one variable for every player in that case, the select hook allow you to drop the variable(also if u even change the weapon u're in scope to the same weapon it count as "select")
/maybe i'm wrong just kill me :v
edited 2×, last 12.11.19 08:05:04 pm
mrc: I know right, but as I said I just made an idea for 3 minutes. Just tired after job and less attentive. Fixed post, thanks anyways. 1