Quality Control
Offline
Forum
Unreal Software Quality Control
Poll
Should Quality Control be enforced?
Only registered users are allowed to vote
| Yes | 90.48% (38) | |
| Maybe | 4.76% (2) | |
| No | 4.76% (2) |
42 votes cast
I think however that all or most files for other games than CS2D should be accepted because there aren't many anyway. Over 7800 of the ~8500 files here are for CS2D.
Approved user - someone who has proven his skill in the skins making already
Thats the whole point of my idea
zazz: DC said he'll make a thread about it later but using common sense, I'm guessing you have to be an user that's been here for a while, active on forum (thus sees the files uploaded) and can evaluate a file fairly. Rainoth has written@ zazz: DC said he'll make a thread about it later but using common sense, I'm guessing you have to be an user that's been here for a while, active on forum (thus sees the files uploaded) and can evaluate a file fairly.
zazz: DC said he'll make a thread about it later but using common sense, I'm guessing you have to be an user that's been here for a while, active on forum (thus sees the files uploaded) and can evaluate a file fairly.Good!, btw i've always been here, since 2009.
This was my EX Usgn: 24837
Yeah, DC aldready knows about it.
CY: file will take a whole year..But how long does it take to 'review' a file DC has writtenOf course very popular files should not be declined even if they contain bugs. Bugs are not a reason at all to remove files.
And files fixing bugs of popular scripts because the actual author is inactive shouldn't be removed either I guess. Unless there are good reasons to do so.
And files fixing bugs of popular scripts because the actual author is inactive shouldn't be removed either I guess. Unless there are good reasons to do so.
So there's this idea... to make comments to the approved files as well, like, for example:
Quote
This file has been reviewed and approved by Someone (Somewhen)
Recommended to download bugfixes there and there
This file has been reviewed and approved by Someone (Somewhen) Recommended to download bugfixes there and thereOf course this makes sense only if there are more files of that type
Mami Tomoe has writtenAdd a feature to report a file, over ~10 reports will decline it.
It can get very abusive
zazz: the mods will see who reported and if its a false report, free bans for all DC: Does every updated file in File Archive, remove "approved" mark to "unreviewed"? Gaios. A file which had been approved already stays approved forever unless someone manually changes the status. Yes, this could be exploited but whoever does this will get punished. Reviewing already approved files after each edit would be too much. DC: What I meant before with old bugged files is do they get their own review status? They cannot simply be approved as this would give the impression that they work no matter what. Approving the file but adding a comment pointing towards files which solve these bugs would be the most easiest solution. But I wanted your take on this to see how you feel about it. Yates: Too complex, too much work. Not maintainable. I would just approve them unless they're entirely useless. Whoever wants can write a comment and link to fixes there.Here's the reviewer election thread:
Reviewers wanted 
File does not exist (16712)yes we need it!